Why are women so averse to logically palpable communication? And if their lingo is based on contrived concealment — why haven’t men evolved the necessary requisites to connect in the manner of subtle signaling? Why are we so brutally logic and they so capriciously emotional? It would seem that men who are flexible when it comes to this duality enjoy higher mating success, so why hasn’t this disparity been reconciled?
An oft forgotten fact is that the monogamous Matrix we now live in is not just a fairly new system; but a straight up absolutely “surprise” split second mental gangbang for a species meant to exist in temporally polygamous relationships centered on apex Alphas. And after thrusting our upgraded simian psyches into said Matrix, we have developed a bunch of new perceptions of the world that we can’t seem to understand, let alone agree with. They are in perpetual discord with our true natures and out of tune with our biologically pre-programmed paradigms. For instance, it is true that men are supposed to use relationships to get secks and women to use secks to get relationships. We tend to forget that MALE AFFECTION is supposed to be something of value. Sadly, in our era, it is not. In fact, for the most part, especially among beta milieus, it is detested and in gross over abundance.
Just think about this statement for a second. Imagine it was being directed to a girl. “You maintain the household family, etc, and in return, you get attention from your husband.” It sounds ridiculous right? And in a world where female self-sufficiency carries on and extensive measures are taken by supra institutions to equalize resource attribution between men and women, it IS ridiculous. If a girl makes $60,000 and her husband $30,000; INTER-dependency and balance are a long shot. God forbid she’s also working as an assistant to a hedge fund manager in his mid 30s and still looking for fresh poon to pounce on, his genes are even more in danger and he’s better off helping his sister or brother in their marriage to replicate his kin.
Hence a maxim of interest, every day when you wake up, ask yourself “how valuable is my attention?” Imagine you’re living with your girlfriend and you play 2 hours of Call of Duty a day. Those 2 hours could easily be redirected to her without any tangible loss. To her, they are visibly worthless. In the same fashion, “Guy time” can be a turn off if it consists of getting high for 4 hours every single day. This is why your girlfriend gets resentful if you can’t spend time with her because you’re playing world of warcraft. Your time has no value. Her hamster realizes that she is conceding her OWN secksual market value by yearning for those 2 hours.
So why does that entire equation change in regards to an Alpha? Assuming we really are talking about an Alpha male, his girlfriend must be cognizant of HIS secksual market value. In other words, any time spent on her is time away from “other girls.” If he’s spending that time playing video games, there’s not as much to fuss about because those 2 hours in front of a PS3 have implicit value — as they are 2 hours desired by OTHER women. An argument can even be made for why this proves external game is more important than lifestyle game; you can waste as much time as you want as long as you act Alpha, consistently retain competitive anxiety, and thus grant your hours intrinsic value.
Some have wondered, how do you strike a balance between giving too much and too little attention? This is how. So long as your affection has VALUE, it can be given, as you desire. As soon as it becomes valueless, I e; taken for granted, it must be retracted. Equilibrium. Simple.
On that note, why are feminists in a rage about secks robots and why do girlfriends get so irritated if you fap to perfect 10s on Brazzers? Think back to the dynamic — what does it take away? The power of intimacy. Again, why is competitive anxiety so important in every relationship? Why must your girlfriend know that you are at least capable of procuring secks from other females? It helps to keep the relationship in that oh so delicate power balance.
Turning back to our original question, so why aren’t men good at covert communication? Why is this a skill that must be acquired through practice and Game? Applying the same logic discussed above; because it was never necessary. Alpha males who normally had multiple partners concurrently, and with no social stigma around their rotating harems, never had to “communicate” competitive anxiety. It was ever present. Confidence didn’t need to be hinted towards because only men with intrinsic value and ostensible proxies were considered as mates. There was no such thing as incongruency. Nowadays, every other well dressed guy with a Mercedes is a beta. Actually, every 99/100 of them are. This isn’t how it worked before. Bear eats man, man is beta. Man kills bear, Man is Alpha. There weren’t facades, delusions, illusions, tricks, or mockeries, a girl didn’t need to shit test.
And why do women hate overt communication so much? Ironically, because its fake. Tell your girlfriend “I can get other girls,” and boom, you’re try-hard. Sulking. AFC. Even if you CAN get other girls, it’s because you’re trying. See above example, Alpha means not trying. Tell your girlfriend “this really bothers me” and you’re in a beta shit storm. A bitch puppy. Crying about her machinations because why; they hurt your feelings? Pussy. Even things that are brazen in nature, like “drawing the line,” should be done covertly. She does something bad, soft next. She does something really bad, dump her. Explicate, do not deliberate. Your girlfriend should know that if she cheats, you will leave. You should not have to tell her or even worse, have a discussion about it. Literally saying “I’m going to leave if you do this!” is a bitch move.
Then again, this shit is kinda cute. I guess it’s understandable why some guys choose to live like one.